Epidemiology is the scientific study of the distribution, patterns, and determinants of health-related events in populations, as well as the application of this knowledge to prevent disease and improve public health. The history of epidemiology reflects humanityโs long-standing efforts to understand the causes of illness and the factors influencing health within communities. Over time, epidemiology has evolved from simple observations of disease occurrence to a sophisticated scientific discipline that integrates statistics, biology, environmental science, and public health practice.
The origins of epidemiological thinking can be traced to ancient civilizations, where attempts were made to explain disease outbreaks and their spread. Early explanations often attributed illness to supernatural forces, divine punishment, or environmental influences. As societies developed, observations of disease patterns led to the recognition that certain illnesses appeared more frequently in particular locations, seasons, occupations, or population groups. These observations laid the foundation for understanding the relationship between environmental conditions and human health.
During the medieval and early modern periods, recurrent epidemics of infectious diseases highlighted the need for systematic approaches to disease prevention and control. Governments and communities began implementing measures such as quarantine, isolation, and sanitation to limit disease transmission. Although knowledge of disease causation remained limited, these interventions demonstrated that population-level actions could reduce the impact of outbreaks.
The development of scientific methods and advances in data collection transformed epidemiology into a more evidence-based discipline. Systematic recording of births, deaths, and disease occurrence enabled researchers to identify trends and compare health outcomes across populations. Statistical analysis became increasingly important in evaluating disease patterns, measuring risk factors, and assessing the effectiveness of interventions. These developments strengthened the ability to investigate outbreaks and establish associations between exposures and health outcomes.
The twentieth century marked a major expansion of epidemiology beyond infectious diseases. Improvements in public health reduced the burden of many communicable diseases, while chronic conditions such as cardiovascular diseases, cancer, diabetes, and respiratory disorders emerged as leading causes of morbidity and mortality. Epidemiological methods were adapted to study lifestyle, environmental, occupational, genetic, and social determinants of health. More recently, advances in molecular biology, genomics, geographic information systems, and digital health technologies have enhanced the capacity to monitor disease patterns and identify emerging health threats.
Today, epidemiology serves as a cornerstone of public health, guiding disease surveillance, outbreak investigation, health policy development, and evidence-based interventions. Its historical evolution has contributed significantly to improving population health and continues to play a critical role in addressing contemporary global health challenges.
The emergence and development of epidemiology
The devastating impact of infectious diseases such as cholera, typhoid fever, smallpox, plague, and other epidemic illnesses provided a major impetus for the development of epidemiology as a scientific discipline. For centuries, these diseases caused widespread mortality, disrupted societies, and posed significant challenges to human survival. The urgent need to understand the causes, patterns, and modes of transmission of these diseases stimulated scientific inquiry and laid the foundation for what would eventually become the field of epidemiology. Today, epidemiology is recognized as one of the most important disciplines in public health, providing the scientific basis for disease prevention, control, and health promotion.
The roots of epidemiological thought can be traced back more than 2,000 years to ancient Greece. During this period, observations were made suggesting that disease occurrence was not solely the result of supernatural forces but could be influenced by environmental conditions and characteristics of individuals. It was recognized that factors such as climate, water quality, living conditions, and personal habits could affect the development and spread of diseases within populations. This marked a significant shift in thinking, as it encouraged the systematic study of disease patterns and their determinants.
Although these early observations provided a conceptual foundation, epidemiology did not begin to emerge as a quantitative science until the seventeenth century. A major breakthrough occurred in 1662 whenย John Graunt, a London merchant and demographer, conducted one of the first systematic analyses of population health data. By examining records of births, deaths, and causes of death in London, Graunt identified patterns in mortality and disease occurrence that had previously gone unnoticed. His work demonstrated that health events within populations could be measured, quantified, and analyzed systematically. Graunt’s analysis revealed important relationships between demographic factors and disease occurrence, establishing a methodological framework that would later become central to epidemiological research.
Grauntโs pioneering efforts marked the beginning of population-based health studies and introduced the concept of using numerical data to understand disease dynamics. His findings showed that mortality was not entirely random but followed identifiable patterns that could be studied and interpreted. This realization encouraged further investigations into the distribution of diseases and the factors associated with their occurrence.
The discipline advanced considerably during the nineteenth century through the contributions of William Farr, who expanded the use of statistical methods in the study of disease. Farr recognized the importance of accurate data collection and developed systematic approaches for recording and analyzing health information. He introduced the routine collection of mortality statistics and helped establish disease surveillance as an essential component of public health practice. By compiling and analyzing large volumes of data on births, deaths, and disease occurrence throughout Britain, Farr demonstrated the value of statistical evidence in understanding population health.
Farr’s work contributed significantly to the development of modern epidemiological methods. His analyses enabled comparisons of disease occurrence across different regions, occupations, age groups, and social classes. Furthermore, his efforts laid the foundation for the classification of diseases based on mortality and morbidity patterns, a practice that remains important in contemporary epidemiology. The systematic use of statistics allowed public health authorities to identify trends, monitor outbreaks, and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing disease burden.
The nineteenth century also witnessed major advances in understanding the transmission of infectious diseases. Repeated outbreaks of cholera, typhoid fever, and other epidemic diseases prompted investigations into their sources and modes of spread. These studies demonstrated the value of observing disease distribution within populations and linking health outcomes to environmental exposures. Such approaches strengthened the scientific basis of epidemiology and established many of the principles that continue to guide outbreak investigations today.
As scientific knowledge expanded, epidemiology evolved from a discipline focused primarily on infectious diseases to one that addresses a broad range of health conditions. During the twentieth century, improvements in sanitation, vaccination, and medical care reduced the burden of many communicable diseases. Consequently, epidemiologists increasingly turned their attention to chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, and respiratory illnesses. New analytical methods were developed to investigate lifestyle, occupational, environmental, genetic, and social determinants of health.
Today, epidemiology is a multidisciplinary science that integrates biostatistics, microbiology, environmental health, genetics, and social sciences to understand disease patterns and improve population health. It plays a critical role in disease surveillance, outbreak investigation, risk assessment, health policy formulation, and the evaluation of public health interventions. Modern epidemiological approaches have been instrumental in addressing emerging infectious diseases, monitoring antimicrobial resistance, and responding to global health emergencies.
The historical development of epidemiology illustrates how the quest to understand and control devastating diseases transformed public health practice. From early observations of environmental influences on disease to sophisticated modern methods of disease surveillance and analysis, epidemiology has evolved into an indispensable tool for protecting and improving the health of populations worldwide.
William Farrโs contribution to the development of epidemiology
William Farr played a foundational role in transforming epidemiology into a quantitatively driven discipline. Building on earlier efforts to describe disease patterns in populations, Farr introduced systematic statistical approaches that significantly advanced the study of disease distribution and mortality. His work in the nineteenth century marked a critical shift from descriptive accounts of illness toward structured analysis based on numerical data, enabling more reliable interpretation of public health trends.
One of Farrโs most important contributions was the establishment and refinement of vital statistics systems. He developed methods for the consistent collection, classification, and analysis of birth and death records across populations. By organizing mortality data in a structured format, he enabled comparisons of disease occurrence across time, place, and demographic groups. This approach allowed for the identification of patterns that were previously hidden within unstructured records, providing new insights into population health.
Farr also advanced the concept of disease classification based on mortality and morbidity patterns. His systematic categorization of causes of death contributed to the early development of standardized nosology, which later influenced modern disease classification systems. This standardization was essential for ensuring consistency in public health reporting and for enabling meaningful comparisons between different regions and time periods.
Farr was instrumental in introducing the idea of surveillance in public health practice. By continuously monitoring mortality trends, he demonstrated how changes in disease patterns could be detected and analyzed over time. This approach laid the groundwork for modern epidemiological surveillance systems used to detect outbreaks and monitor public health threats. Farrโs analytical methods also emphasized the importance of population denominators in calculating rates of disease and mortality. This innovation allowed epidemiologists to move beyond simple counts of deaths and instead assess risk within defined populations, improving the accuracy of public health assessments. Farrโs contributions established statistical reasoning as a core component of epidemiology and strengthened the scientific basis for public health decision-making. His work remains a cornerstone in the historical development of epidemiological methods.
John Snow and the birth of modern epidemiology
The nineteenth century marked a turning point in the development of epidemiology as a scientific discipline, largely due to the groundbreaking investigations of John Snow. Widely regarded as the father of modern epidemiology and the first epidemiologist, Snow laid the foundation for the systematic study of disease distribution and determinants within populations (Figure 1). Through a series of investigations conducted between 1849 and 1854, he demonstrated how careful observation, data collection, and analytical reasoning could be used to identify the source of disease outbreaks and guide effective public health interventions.
At a time when infectious diseases were responsible for significant morbidity and mortality across Europe, cholera emerged as one of the most feared epidemics. Recurrent outbreaks swept through major cities, including London, causing thousands of deaths and overwhelming public health authorities. The exact cause and mode of transmission of cholera remained poorly understood, and prevailing theories often attributed disease occurrence to miasmas or โbad air.โ Against this backdrop, Snow embarked on a series of investigations aimed at uncovering the true cause of cholera transmission and identifying measures to prevent future outbreaks.
One of Snowโs most significant contributions to epidemiology was the introduction of disease mapping as a scientific tool for investigating health events. By systematically collecting information on the geographical distribution of disease cases, he demonstrated that patterns of illness within a population could reveal important clues about the source and spread of an outbreak. This innovative approach represented one of the earliest applications of spatial analysis in public health and continues to influence modern epidemiological investigations, particularly in the study and surveillance of infectious diseases.
Prior to his famous investigations in London, Snow had examined outbreaks of cholera among specific population groups and initially considered that the disease might be associated with poor hygiene practices, including unwashed hands and the sharing of contaminated food. However, continued observations during subsequent epidemics led him to question these assumptions. Through rigorous analysis of disease patterns and exposure histories, he gradually developed the hypothesis that cholera was primarily transmitted through contaminated water rather than through direct person-to-person contact or exposure to foul-smelling air.
The broad street cholera outbreak and the waterborne theory of disease
Snowโs most celebrated epidemiological investigation occurred during the cholera outbreak that struck London in 1854. As cases rapidly increased in the Broad Street area of Soho, he undertook a detailed examination of the affected population to identify possible common exposures among those who had contracted the disease. His investigation involved collecting information on the residences, workplaces, and daily activities of infected individuals, as well as identifying their sources of drinking water.
To better understand the distribution of cases, Snow plotted the locations of cholera deaths on a map of the affected neighborhood. This โspot mapโ revealed a striking clustering of cases around a public water source known as the Broad Street pump. The visual representation of disease occurrence provided compelling evidence that the outbreak was linked to a localized environmental source. Snow carefully analyzed death records and observed that many individuals who had died from cholera either lived near the pump or regularly obtained drinking water from it.
Further investigation revealed additional evidence supporting his hypothesis. Individuals living far from Broad Street but who consumed water from the pump were found to have contracted cholera, whereas some residents living nearby who obtained water from alternative sources remained unaffected. Snow conducted interviews with affected households and compared water consumption patterns among infected and non-infected individuals. These observations consistently pointed to the Broad Street pump as the common factor associated with the outbreak.
Subsequent investigations confirmed that the water from the pump had been contaminated by sewage containing the pathogen (Vibrio cholerae) responsible for cholera. At the time, the specific microorganism had not yet been identified, but Snow recognized that some disease-producing agent must have entered the water supply and caused infection among those who consumed it. His conclusions directly challenged the dominant miasma theory and provided strong evidence for the waterborne transmission of cholera.
Based on his findings, Snow recommended that authorities remove the handle of the Broad Street pump to prevent residents from accessing its contaminated water. Following the removal of the pump handle, the number of new cholera cases declined significantly, and the outbreak was effectively brought under control. Although debate continues regarding the extent to which this intervention alone ended the epidemic, the event remains one of the most celebrated examples of evidence-based public health action and is widely regarded as a landmark achievement in epidemiological history.
Snow’s investigations extended beyond the Broad Street outbreak. During the cholera epidemics of 1849 and 1854, he examined the relationship between disease occurrence and the water supplies provided by two major London water companies: the Lambeth Water Company and the Southwark and Vauxhall Water Company. Both companies initially drew water from sections of the River Thames that were heavily contaminated by sewage and household waste. However, the Lambeth Water Company later relocated its water intake to a cleaner section of the river upstream from major sewage discharge points.
Snow compared cholera mortality among households served by the two companies and observed substantial differences in disease rates. Residents supplied with cleaner water experienced significantly lower rates of cholera than those receiving water from more contaminated sources. This natural experiment provided some of the strongest evidence available at the time for the role of contaminated water in cholera transmission. By demonstrating a clear association between water quality and disease occurrence, Snow strengthened the scientific basis for environmental sanitation and public health reform.
The significance of Snowโs work extends far beyond the cholera epidemics of nineteenth-century London. His investigations introduced many of the methodological principles that define modern epidemiology, including systematic data collection, disease surveillance, comparative analysis, hypothesis testing, and the use of geographic information to identify patterns of disease distribution. Furthermore, his emphasis on identifying environmental risk factors and implementing evidence-based interventions established a model for outbreak investigation that continues to guide public health practice worldwide.
Today, Snowโs contributions are recognized as foundational to the discipline of epidemiology. His pioneering use of disease mapping, field investigation, and population-based analysis transformed the study of disease from a largely descriptive endeavor into a rigorous scientific process. By demonstrating that careful observation and empirical evidence could reveal the causes of disease outbreaks, he helped establish epidemiology as an essential tool for disease prevention, control, and the protection of population health. His work remains a cornerstone of public health education and continues to inspire epidemiologists in their efforts to understand and combat both emerging and established health threats.
The legacy of John Snow and the evolution of epidemiological methods
One of the most remarkable aspects of the pioneering work of John Snow was that it was conducted at a time when the existence of microorganisms as agents of disease was not yet fully understood. During the mid-nineteenth century, scientific knowledge regarding bacteria, viruses, and other pathogens was still limited, and the dominant explanation for many diseases remained the miasma theory, which proposed that diseases were caused by poisonous vapors or “bad air” arising from decomposing organic matter. Despite the absence of microbiological evidence, Snow’s investigations demonstrated the power of systematic observation and population-based analysis in identifying the causes and patterns of disease occurrence.
Snow’s conclusions regarding cholera transmission were derived entirely from epidemiological observations rather than laboratory investigations. Through careful examination of disease distribution according to person, place, and time, he was able to identify common exposures among affected individuals and establish a link between cholera and contaminated drinking water. These three fundamental epidemiological variables: person, place, and time remain central to modern epidemiological investigations and continue to serve as the foundation for disease surveillance and outbreak analysis.
The significance of Snow’s work lies not only in his identification of contaminated water as the vehicle of cholera transmission but also in the methodological framework he established for studying disease occurrence. His investigations demonstrated that epidemiological data could be systematically collected, analyzed, and interpreted to understand disease emergence and spread within populations. More importantly, his work showed that epidemiological evidence could guide public health decision-making and lead to interventions capable of preventing future outbreaks.
Snow’s findings had far-reaching implications for public health policy in England and beyond. The evidence generated from his investigations encouraged improvements in water treatment systems, sewage disposal, and environmental sanitation. These reforms contributed significantly to reducing the burden of waterborne diseases in urban populations. His meticulous approach to data collection and analysis marked a departure from traditional disease observation methods and established a scientific basis for public health action. Today, disease surveillance systems, outbreak investigations, contact tracing programs, and geographic information systems used in public health all reflect principles first demonstrated in Snow’s epidemiological studies.
The influence of Snow’s work extended throughout Europe and eventually across the world. Snowโs investigations provided a practical model for understanding disease transmission and controlling epidemics. Modern epidemiology continues to rely heavily on the principles he introduced, particularly the use of population data to identify risk factors, detect outbreaks, evaluate interventions, and guide public health policies. Snow’s contributions are widely regarded as a cornerstone in the development of epidemiology as a scientific discipline.
The germ theory era: identifying the causative agents of disease
While epidemiological investigations provided strong evidence regarding disease transmission, the actual microorganisms responsible for many infectious diseases remained unknown until the late nineteenth century. Advances in microbiology and laboratory science eventually complemented epidemiological observations and led to the identification of specific disease-causing agents. A major breakthrough occurred in 1883 when Robert Koch successfully identified the bacterium responsible for cholera. The organism, later named Vibrio cholerae, was found to be a curved, comma-shaped bacterium capable of contaminating water supplies and causing severe gastrointestinal disease. Koch’s discovery provided microbiological confirmation of the conclusions that Snow had reached decades earlier through epidemiological investigations. Together, the work of Snow and Koch established a powerful relationship between epidemiology and microbiology that continues to underpin infectious disease research and control efforts.
Another important infectious disease that shaped the development of epidemiology was typhoid fever. During the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, typhoid fever caused substantial illness and death in many parts of the world. The disease is caused by the bacterium Salmonella Typhi, a Gram-negative pathogen transmitted primarily through the consumption of contaminated food and water. Poor sanitation, inadequate sewage disposal, and unsafe food-handling practices contributed significantly to its spread.
One of the most famous epidemiological investigations associated with typhoid fever involved Mary Mallon, who became known as “Typhoid Mary.” Mallon worked as a cook in several households in New York during the early twentieth century. Epidemiological investigations linked multiple outbreaks of typhoid fever to households where she had been employed. What made her case particularly significant was that she appeared healthy and exhibited no clinical symptoms of the disease, despite carrying and shedding the bacterium in her feces.
The discovery of Mallon’s role in disease transmission introduced the important epidemiological concept of the asymptomatic carrier. Prior to this, it was generally assumed that individuals who transmitted disease would themselves exhibit signs of illness. However, investigations revealed that apparently healthy individuals could harbor infectious agents and unknowingly spread disease to others. Stool examinations confirmed that Mallon continuously excreted large numbers of S. Typhi organisms, thereby contaminating food she prepared and facilitating disease transmission.
Public health authorities initially isolated Mallon and later released her after she promised not to engage in food preparation. However, she subsequently resumed working as a cook under a different identity, resulting in additional outbreaks of typhoid fever. As a consequence, she was re-isolated and remained under public health supervision for more than two decades until her death in 1938. Although controversial from ethical and legal perspectives, the case highlighted the importance of surveillance, contact tracing, carrier detection, and public health intervention in controlling infectious diseases. The investigations surrounding cholera and typhoid fever significantly advanced epidemiological thinking by demonstrating the roles of environmental contamination, human behavior, and asymptomatic carriers in disease transmission. These lessons continue to inform modern strategies for controlling foodborne and waterborne diseases worldwide.
Robert Koch and the advancement of epidemiological science
The development of epidemiology as a scientifically grounded discipline was significantly strengthened by the contributions of Robert Koch, whose work in the late nineteenth century provided definitive microbiological evidence linking specific microorganisms to specific diseases. While earlier epidemiological investigations, particularly those of John Snow, had strongly suggested environmental sources of infection, Kochโs laboratory-based discoveries confirmed the biological agents responsible for many infectious diseases, thereby consolidating the germ theory of disease and transforming public health practice.
Koch is best known for identifying the causative agents of several major infectious diseases, including tuberculosis, cholera, and anthrax. His systematic approach to isolating, culturing, and identifying pathogens introduced a rigorous experimental framework that complemented field-based epidemiological investigations. One of his most influential contributions was the identification of the bacterium Vibrio cholerae in 1883 during his investigations of cholera outbreaks in Egypt and India. This discovery provided direct microbiological confirmation of the transmission pathways that had earlier been hypothesized through epidemiological mapping and population studies.
Koch also developed methodological principles, commonly referred to as Kochโs postulates, which established criteria for linking a specific microorganism to a specific disease. These postulates became a foundational tool in medical microbiology and epidemiology, guiding researchers in determining causation rather than mere association. His work helped shift the scientific community away from speculative explanations of disease toward evidence-based causal inference grounded in laboratory verification.
The integration of Kochโs microbiological discoveries with earlier epidemiological findings marked a turning point in public health science. It enabled a more precise understanding of disease transmission, supported the development of diagnostic techniques, and facilitated targeted interventions such as sanitation improvements, water treatment, and infection control measures. Kochโs contributions not only validated the work of earlier epidemiologists but also established a stronger scientific foundation for modern epidemiology and infectious disease control.
Expansion of epidemiology beyond infectious diseases
The successes achieved in investigating and controlling infectious diseases encouraged epidemiologists to apply similar methods to the study of noninfectious conditions. As improvements in sanitation, vaccination, antibiotics, and public health infrastructure reduced the burden of many communicable diseases during the twentieth century, chronic diseases emerged as major causes of morbidity and mortality.
Researchers began using epidemiological techniques to investigate diseases such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and chronic respiratory disorders. Unlike infectious diseases, these conditions are generally not caused by pathogens but result from complex interactions among genetic, environmental, behavioral, and social factors. Epidemiologists therefore expanded their focus from identifying infectious agents to studying risk factors associated with disease occurrence.
One of the most influential developments in modern epidemiology was the identification of behavioral and environmental risk factors for chronic diseases. For example, large-scale epidemiological studies demonstrated a strong association between cigarette smoking and lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cardiovascular disease. Similar investigations identified links between dietary habits, physical inactivity, obesity, occupational exposures, environmental pollution, and various chronic health conditions. These findings transformed public health practice by emphasizing prevention through risk-factor modification rather than treatment alone.
Epidemiology has also played a critical role in the control and elimination of numerous communicable diseases. Through surveillance programs, vaccination campaigns, and population-based interventions, diseases such as smallpox have been eradicated globally, while others such as measles, polio, and chickenpox have been substantially controlled in many regions. The success of these programs has depended heavily on epidemiological methods used to monitor disease occurrence, identify vulnerable populations, evaluate intervention effectiveness, and guide resource allocation.
Following the World War II, epidemiological research expanded dramatically due to advances in statistics, computing, laboratory science, and public health infrastructure. Cohort studies, case-control studies, randomized trials, and surveillance systems became increasingly sophisticated, enabling researchers to investigate a wide range of health outcomes and determinants. More recently, molecular epidemiology, genomic surveillance, geographic information systems, and digital health technologies have further enhanced the ability to detect, monitor, and control diseases.
Today, epidemiology remains one of the most important pillars of public health. It provides the scientific framework for understanding disease patterns, identifying risk factors, evaluating interventions, and developing evidence-based health policies. From controlling infectious diseases such as cholera and typhoid fever to addressing contemporary challenges such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, antimicrobial resistance, and emerging pandemics, epidemiological research continues to improve health outcomes worldwide. The discipline’s evolution from the observational studies of the nineteenth century to the sophisticated analytical methods used today reflects its enduring importance in protecting and promoting population health on a global scale.
References
Aschengrau A and Seage G.R (2013). Essentials of Epidemiology in Public Health. Third edition. Jones and Bartleh Learning,
Aschengrau, A., & G. R. Seage III. (2009). Essentials of Epidemiology in Public Health. Boston: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
Balows A, Hausler W, Herrmann K.L, Isenberg H.D and Shadomy H.J (1991). Manual of clinical microbiology. 5th ed. American Society of Microbiology Press, USA.
Bonita R., Beaglehole R., Kjellstrรถm T (2006). Basic epidemiology. 2nd edition. World Health Organization. Pp. 1-226.
Brooks G.F., Butel J.S and Morse S.A (2004). Medical Microbiology, 23rd edition. McGraw Hill Publishers. USA.
Castillo-Salgado C (2010). Trends and directions of global public health surveillance. Epidemiol Rev, 32:93โ109.
Centers for Disease Control and National Institutes of Health (1999). Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories, 4th edn, Washington DC: CDC.
Champoux J.J, Neidhardt F.C, Drew W.L and Plorde J.J (2004). Sherris Medical Microbiology: An Introduction to Infectious Diseases. 4th edition. McGraw Hill Companies Inc, USA.
Gordis L (2013). Epidemiology. Fifth edition. Saunders Publishers, USA.
Guillemin J (2006). Scientists and the history of biological weapons. European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO) Reports, Vol 7, Special Issue: S45-S49.
Halliday JE, Meredith AL, Knobel DL, Shaw DJ, Bronsvoort BMC, Cleaveland S (2007). A framework for evaluating animals as sentinels for infectious disease surveillance. J R Soc Interface, 4:973โ984.
Lucas A.O and Gilles H.M (2003). Short Textbook of Public Health Medicine for the tropics. Fourth edition. Hodder Arnold Publication, UK.
MacMahon B., Trichopoulos D (1996). Epidemiology Principles and Methods. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company. USA.
Nelson K.E and Williams C (2013). Infectious Disease Epidemiology: Theory and Practice. Third edition. Jones and Bartleh Learning.
Porta M (2008). A dictionary of epidemiology. 5th edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rothman K.J and Greenland S (1998). Modern epidemiology, 2nd edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven.
Rothman K.J, Greenland S and Lash T.L (2011). Modern Epidemiology. Third edition. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Discover more from Microbiology Class
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
