HOST-PARASITE RELATIONSHIPS (MICROBIAL ASSOCIATIONS)

A host-parasite relationship is an association that exists between two organisms known as the host and the parasite, in which both organisms either derive benefit from the relationship or is harmed in the process. Microorganisms are ubiquitous, and they often exist in association with other forms of life in their ecological niches including man, plants animals and other microbes. The human host for example is regularly in contact with microorganisms. However, only a few of these microbes are able to establish themselves within the host tissues and/or cells to either cause disease or improve the host’s health. To survive and reproduce, the host and the parasite must co-evolve in such a way that their association does not leave any untoward effect on each other. Nevertheless, some host-parasite relationship such as parasitism is only beneficial to the parasite while the host suffers or dies in the association.

The evolution of life on planet earth has allowed both the host and its parasite to co-evolve in several beneficial and disadvantageous relationships. And to survive, the host continually develops novel strategies or mechanisms that protect it from the detrimental activities of the parasite. The co-evolution of the host and the parasite has also allowed the parasite to also develop mechanisms that enable it to survive within the host. Microorganisms in the soil, water, air and in other parts of the environment exhibit or go into a host-parasite association for several reasons including but not limited to the derivation of nutrients, production  of important metabolites or for protection. Bacteria for example are consistently associated with the body surfaces of animals, man and plants. And in the soil, nitrogen-fixing bacteria help in nitrogen fixation – an important growth process required by plants especially leguminous plants.

There are many more bacterial cells on the surface of humans (including the gastrointestinal tract) than there are human cells that make up the body; and these organisms go into association with their human host to either harm them or derive benefit from them. The bacteria and other microbes that are consistently associated with an animal are called the indigenous microbiota or normal microflora of the animal or human. And these microorganisms exhibit a variety of symbiotic interactions including parasitism, commensalism, amensalism, competition, predation, cooperation and mutualism with their animal or human hosts. Amensalism, predation, competition and parasitism are harmful interactions exhibited by microbes while commensalism, cooperation and mutualism are beneficial interactions that microorganisms exhibit in their niche habitat.

SYMBIOSIS

A symbiotic association is a persistent and intimate biological relationship between two or more dissimilar organisms. These interactions are typically characterized by close physical proximity and long-term ecological interdependence. Symbiosis encompasses a spectrum of outcomes, ranging from mutually beneficial partnerships to relationships in which one organism benefits at the expense of the other. Microorganisms—particularly bacteria and fungi—frequently engage in symbiotic associations with plants, animals, and other microbes, thereby playing indispensable roles in ecosystem functioning, nutrient cycling, host physiology, and evolutionary adaptation. One of the most extensively studied examples of microbial symbiosis is the association between nitrogen-fixing bacteria and leguminous plants. Species of Rhizobium establish a mutualistic relationship with legumes such as beans and peas. In this interaction, the bacteria colonize specialized root structures known as nodules, where they convert atmospheric nitrogen (N₂) into ammonia (NH₃) through the enzymatic process of biological nitrogen fixation. This process is mediated by the nitrogenase enzyme complex and occurs under tightly regulated, microaerophilic conditions within the nodules. The ammonia produced is assimilated into amino acids and other nitrogenous compounds that are readily utilized by the plant. In return, the plant supplies the bacteria with photosynthetically derived carbohydrates and a protected ecological niche. This symbiosis is of profound ecological importance because atmospheric nitrogen, although abundant, is chemically inert and unavailable to most living organisms. By transforming N₂ into bioavailable forms, nitrogen-fixing bacteria sustain primary productivity and contribute significantly to global nitrogen cycling.

Microbial symbiosis is equally critical in animal systems. In ruminant mammals such as cattle, complex consortia of bacteria, archaea, protozoa, and fungi inhabit the rumen, forming a highly specialized microbial ecosystem. These microorganisms produce cellulolytic enzymes that degrade cellulose and other structural polysaccharides present in plant biomass—substrates that the host animal cannot digest independently. Through anaerobic fermentation, these microbes generate volatile fatty acids (e.g., acetate, propionate, and butyrate), which serve as primary energy sources for the host. Additionally, rumen microorganisms synthesize essential vitamins (such as B-complex vitamins), microbial proteins, and other metabolites that enhance host nutrition. This mutualistic arrangement enables ruminants to exploit fibrous plant materials and occupy ecological niches inaccessible to non-ruminant herbivores. Humans also maintain intricate symbiotic relationships with diverse microbial communities collectively referred to as the microbiota. These microorganisms colonize the skin, gastrointestinal tract, oral cavity, and other mucosal surfaces. Commensal and mutualistic bacteria contribute to host health by competitively excluding pathogenic organisms, modulating immune responses, and synthesizing essential nutrients, including vitamin K and certain B vitamins. Furthermore, the gut microbiota plays a central role in metabolic regulation, short-chain fatty acid production, and maintenance of intestinal barrier integrity. Disruption of these symbiotic communities—termed dysbiosis—has been associated with a range of pathological conditions, including inflammatory disorders and metabolic diseases. Symbiotic associations can be broadly categorized into mutualism (both partners benefit), commensalism (one benefits without affecting the other), parasitism (one benefits at the expense of the other), predation, competition, and cooperation. These interaction types are not always rigidly defined; rather, they may shift along a continuum depending on environmental conditions and host physiology. Symbiotic relationships underscore the fundamental principle that no organism exists in isolation. Instead, life is sustained through complex networks of biological interdependence that shape ecosystem structure, stability, and evolutionary trajectories.

MUTUALISM

Mutualism is a biological interaction in which two organisms of different species engage in a close association that confers reciprocal benefits. The participating organisms are referred to as symbionts, and the interaction itself is a form of symbiosis characterized specifically by positive fitness outcomes for both partners. Unlike commensalism or parasitism, where one organism benefits at the expense of the other or without affecting it, mutualism enhances the survival, growth, or reproductive success of each organism involved. These interactions may be obligate, where both species depend entirely on the relationship for survival, or facultative, where the association is beneficial but not strictly necessary. A classical example of microbial mutualism is the formation of lichens through the association between fungi and photosynthetic partners such as cyanobacteria or green algae. In lichens, the fungal component (mycobiont) provides structural support, protection from desiccation, and access to mineral nutrients from substrates such as rocks or tree bark. The photosynthetic partner (photobiont), which may include cyanobacteria from genera such as Nostoc or green algae such as Trebouxia, conducts photosynthesis and supplies organic carbon compounds to the fungus. This tightly integrated partnership enables lichens to colonize extreme environments where neither partner could thrive independently. The evolutionary persistence of lichens illustrates how mutualistic interactions can generate novel ecological capabilities and expand environmental niches.

Mutualistic associations often arise through coevolution, a process in which interacting species exert reciprocal selective pressures on one another over evolutionary time. As each organism adapts to its environment, the other organism becomes a consistent component of that environment. Consequently, traits that enhance cooperation and resource exchange are favored by natural selection. Over generations, this can result in highly specialized physiological and metabolic interdependencies, as seen in many plant–microbe and animal–microbe systems. A prominent example of mutualism in humans and animals is the relationship between the host and the gut microbiota. The gastrointestinal tract (GIT) harbors a complex and diverse microbial community composed primarily of bacteria belonging to phyla such as Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. Many of these microorganisms perform metabolic functions that the host cannot accomplish independently. For instance, certain gut bacteria ferment indigestible dietary polysaccharides, including complex fibers, into short-chain fatty acids such as acetate, propionate, and butyrate. These metabolites serve as energy sources for host epithelial cells and contribute to immune regulation and gut health. In addition, members of the gut microbiota synthesize essential vitamins, including vitamin K and certain B vitamins. In return, the host provides a stable, nutrient-rich environment with consistent temperature, pH, and substrate availability. The bacteria benefit from a continuous supply of undigested food components and a protected ecological niche. This reciprocal exchange exemplifies mutualism: the microorganisms gain sustenance and habitat, while the host gains enhanced digestive efficiency, metabolic capacity, and immune support. Mutualism is a form of symbiosis defined by reciprocal benefit between interacting species. Whether observed in lichens or the gut microbiota of humans and animals, mutualistic relationships illustrate the fundamental role of cooperation in biological systems and the evolutionary advantages conferred by interspecific collaboration.

PARASITISM

Parasitism is a biological interaction in which one organism, termed the parasite, derives benefit at the expense of another organism, known as the host. In this association, the parasite obtains essential resources such as nutrients, shelter, or reproductive advantage, while the host experiences harm. This harm may manifest as reduced growth, impaired reproduction, increased susceptibility to disease, tissue damage, or in severe cases, death. Unlike mutualistic interactions, where both organisms benefit, parasitism is inherently non-mutualistic: the fitness of the parasite increases while the fitness of the host declines. A parasite is therefore defined as an organism that lives on or within another living organism and depends on it metabolically. Parasites typically contribute nothing to the host’s survival; instead, they exploit host resources to complete part or all of their life cycle. The host provides a stable environment and access to nutrients, enabling the parasite to grow, develop, and reproduce. This dependency can be obligate, meaning the parasite cannot complete its life cycle without a host, or facultative, where parasitism is advantageous but not strictly required for survival. Parasitism occurs across all major groups of life, including animals, plants, fungi, protists, bacteria, and viruses. In zoological contexts, parasites are often categorized based on their location relative to the host. Ectoparasites, such as ticks and lice, live on the external surface of the host, feeding on blood or tissues. Endoparasites, including many helminths and protozoa, reside within the host’s body, inhabiting organs, tissues, or the bloodstream. Microparasites, such as bacteria and viruses, typically reproduce rapidly within the host, often provoking strong immune responses. Macroparasites, by contrast, are generally larger organisms that reproduce more slowly and may persist for extended periods within the host. The relationship between parasite and host is shaped by evolutionary pressures.

Parasites evolve mechanisms to invade hosts, evade or suppress immune defenses, and efficiently exploit host resources. Hosts, in turn, develop defensive adaptations such as immune responses, behavioral changes, and physiological barriers to limit parasitic damage. This reciprocal selective pressure can lead to coevolution, where changes in one species drive adaptive changes in the other. Importantly, parasitism does not always result in immediate or severe disease. In many cases, parasites and hosts reach a dynamic equilibrium in which the parasite maximizes transmission without killing the host too rapidly, thereby enhancing its own reproductive success. However, under certain conditions—such as high parasite load, compromised host immunity, or introduction into a new host species—the interaction can become highly pathogenic and even lethal. Parasitism is a specialized ecological and evolutionary relationship characterized by resource exploitation, host harm, and asymmetric benefit. It is a widespread and fundamental biological interaction that influences population dynamics, community structure, and the evolution of species across ecosystems. The parasite lives on or in the body of the host. It is this type of relationship that leads to the establishment of disease or infection in human or animal host. In most of the cases, the host can survive from the infection or disease by using its immune system to restrain the untoward effects of the parasite. But in some cases, the host can die as a result of the deleterious activities of the parasite in the host. Not all parasites have to cause disease. Some parasites such as louse, ticks, fleas, and leeches are parasitic insects or arthropods that do not usually cause disease directly, but they do suck blood from their host including animals and humans. These parasites cause some harm and discomfort to their host during the blood meal. Parasites can also act as vectors (i.e. organisms that transmit disease-causing pathogens to other species of animals and man). Mosquitoes especially the female Anopheles mosquito that harbours the Plasmodium parasites that cause malaria in man are typical examples of vectors because they transmit disease-causing pathogens to their host. The bacteria that cause the bubonic plague (i.e. Yersinia pestis) are carried by rodents, such as rats. The plague bacteria then infect fleas that bite the rats. Infected fleas transmit the bacteria to other animals they bite, including humans. In this case, both the flea and the bacteria are parasites, and the flea is also a vector that transmits the disease causing bacteria (Y. pestis) from the rat to the human host.

COMMENSALISM

Commensalism is a form of interspecific interaction in which one organism, termed the commensal, derives a benefit from its association with another organism, while the second organism experiences neither a measurable benefit nor a detectable harm. It is classified as a type of symbiotic relationship, broadly defined as a close and often long-term biological interaction between individuals of different species. In commensalism specifically, the fitness of the commensal organism is enhanced—through improved access to resources, shelter, transport, or protection—whereas the host organism’s fitness remains essentially unchanged. From an ecological perspective, commensalism occupies a neutral position along the interaction continuum that ranges from mutualism (where both species benefit) to parasitism (where one benefits at the expense of the other). The defining feature of commensalism is the asymmetry of effect: one species gains an advantage, and the other is unaffected in terms of survival, growth, or reproduction. This neutrality distinguishes commensalism from other forms of symbiosis and requires that any benefit or cost to the host be negligible or undetectable under normal conditions. Commensal relationships can arise in various ecological contexts.

One common form is phoresy, in which a smaller organism attaches to a larger one for transportation. For example, certain mites may hitch a ride on insects to disperse to new habitats. The mite gains mobility and access to new environments, while the insect host is not significantly influenced by the presence of the mite. Another form involves inquilinism, where one species lives within the body or dwelling of another without causing harm. Epiphytic plants growing on trees illustrate this pattern: the epiphyte benefits by obtaining physical support and improved exposure to sunlight, while the tree remains unaffected in terms of its physiological performance. Commensalism can also occur in microbial ecosystems. In the human microbiota, some bacterial species may utilize metabolic by-products produced by other microorganisms or by the host without altering host health or microbial community stability. In such cases, the commensal organism benefits from nutrient availability, while the host neither gains nor loses from the association. However, it is important to note that the classification of a relationship as commensal may depend on environmental conditions and detection sensitivity; subtle effects on the host may sometimes go unnoticed or shift under changing ecological circumstances. Commensalism is a symbiotic relationship between two organisms of different species in which one organism benefits and the other is neither helped nor harmed. It represents a biologically significant interaction that contributes to ecological complexity, species coexistence, and resource utilization without imposing detectable costs or benefits on the unaffected partner.

COOPERATION

Cooperation is a form of symbiosis in which both interacting organisms derive measurable benefits from the association. It is often discussed alongside mutualism, but a defining characteristic of cooperation is that the relationship is typically facultative rather than obligatory. In other words, although both partners gain advantages—such as enhanced growth, nutrition, or protection—they are not strictly dependent on one another for survival under all conditions. This distinguishes cooperation from obligate mutualism, where at least one partner cannot complete its life cycle without the other. The interaction between fungi and plant roots in mycorrhizal associations provides a useful illustration of a cooperation association. In these relationships, the fungal partner colonizes the root system of a chlorophyll-containing (autotrophic) plant.

The fungus enhances the plant’s uptake of water and mineral nutrients, particularly phosphorus and micronutrients, by extending the effective absorptive surface area of the root system through its hyphal network. In return, the plant supplies the fungus with photosynthetically derived carbohydrates, which serve as an essential carbon source. Despite these mutual benefits, many vascular plants are capable of completing their life cycle in the absence of mycorrhizal fungi, especially in nutrient-rich soils. This demonstrates that, for such plants, the association is not strictly obligatory. Conversely, certain fungal species are highly specialized and rely heavily—or even entirely—on association with plant roots to obtain carbon, making the relationship effectively obligatory for the fungal partner. Thus, mycorrhizal interactions can range along a continuum from facultative cooperation to obligate mutualism, depending on the species involved and the prevailing environmental conditions.

AMENSALISM

Amensalism is an ecological interaction in which one organism is inhibited or harmed while the other remains unaffected. In microbiology and community ecology, it is classified as a negative (−/0) interaction, distinguishing it from parasitism (+/−), where the benefiting organism derives nutritional or reproductive advantage from the harmed partner. In amensalism, the inhibitory effect is typically incidental rather than a strategy for resource acquisition. The interaction is therefore asymmetrical: one population experiences reduced growth, impaired metabolic activity, or death, whereas the other population exhibits no measurable benefit or detriment. Within microbial communities, amensalism most commonly arises through the production and release of inhibitory metabolites. A microorganism may secrete secondary metabolites, organic acids, bacteriocins, or antibiotics that suppress neighboring competitors. These compounds can disrupt essential cellular processes in susceptible organisms, including cell wall synthesis, protein synthesis, nucleic acid replication, or membrane integrity. For example, antibiotic production by certain soil bacteria suppresses competing microbes in the same ecological niche. The producing organism does not necessarily gain direct nutritional benefit from the inhibition; rather, the affected organism experiences reduced fitness or viability. In some cases, the inhibitory compound is bacteriostatic (preventing growth), while in others it is bactericidal (causing cell death). Some microbial products especially those with antimicrobial effect (e.g. antibiotics) can produce amensalistic effects on the organisms they are in a relationship with; and this could lead to the death or inhibition of the growth of the other microbe. Amensalistic interactions are especially relevant in densely populated environments such as soil, aquatic biofilms, the gastrointestinal tract, and fermented food systems, where microorganisms compete intensely for limited nutrients and space. The secretion of inhibitory compounds can shape community composition, regulate population density, and influence overall ecosystem stability.

From an evolutionary perspective, such interactions may confer indirect ecological advantages—such as reduced competition for resources—even if the interaction is formally categorized as neutral for the producer in strict ecological terms. Amensalism is not restricted to microbe–microbe interactions. It is also observed in host–pathogen and organism–microbe contexts. In humans and animals, components of the innate immune system exert amensalistic effects on invading pathogens. Phagocytic cells such as neutrophils and macrophages release reactive oxygen species, antimicrobial peptides, lysozyme, and other effector molecules that inhibit or destroy microbial invaders. Similarly, epithelial surfaces—including human skin—produce antimicrobial peptides, fatty acids, and acidic secretions that limit colonization by pathogenic microorganisms. In these cases, the host is not metabolically dependent on the pathogen; rather, the pathogen experiences harm while the host maintains homeostasis. In animals and insects, analogous defensive secretions can suppress microbial growth or deter competitors. These biochemical defenses function ecologically in a manner consistent with amensalism, as they reduce the fitness of susceptible organisms without constituting a parasitic exchange. Microbial products with antimicrobial activity—most notably antibiotics—represent classic examples of amensalistic agents. When released into the environment, these compounds can inhibit or eliminate competing microorganisms. In natural ecosystems and clinical settings alike, such interactions influence microbial population dynamics and can contribute to selective pressures that drive antimicrobial resistance. Amensalism is a fundamental ecological interaction that plays a critical role in structuring biological communities. By mediating inhibitory effects across taxa—from microbes to multicellular hosts—it contributes significantly to competitive balance, pathogen control, and ecosystem function.

COMPETITION

Competition is a fundamental ecological interaction in which two or more microorganisms vie for the same limiting resources within a defined habitat. In microbial ecology, competition arises when organisms occupying the same niche require overlapping substrates or physicochemical conditions for growth, metabolism, and reproduction. Because microbial communities often exist in resource-constrained environments—such as soil microhabitats, host tissues, aquatic systems, or biofilms—competition becomes a primary force structuring community composition and function. At its core, competition occurs when the demand for a particular resource exceeds its availability. These resources may include carbon and energy sources, nitrogen, phosphorus, trace elements (e.g., iron), electron acceptors, water, oxygen, or physical space for attachment and colonization. For example, in soil ecosystems, heterotrophic bacteria frequently compete for labile organic carbon fractions, while in host-associated microbiomes, microbes may compete for mucosal binding sites or host-derived nutrients. When such resources are scarce, selective pressures intensify, favoring organisms that can more efficiently acquire, utilize, or monopolize them. Microbial competition is typically categorized as either exploitative (resource-based) or interference-mediated. Exploitative competition occurs indirectly, whereby one organism reduces resource availability through more efficient uptake kinetics, higher growth rates, or superior metabolic flexibility. For instance, microbes possessing high-affinity transport systems or broader catabolic repertoires can rapidly deplete limiting substrates, thereby restricting access for slower-growing competitors.

In contrast, interference competition involves direct antagonistic mechanisms, including the production of antimicrobial compounds (e.g., bacteriocins, antibiotics), secretion systems (such as Type VI secretion systems), or contact-dependent inhibition systems. These strategies suppress or eliminate competing organisms independent of resource depletion alone. In many ecological contexts, competitive interactions conform to the competitive exclusion principle, which states that two species occupying identical niches cannot stably coexist if resources remain limiting. Under such conditions, the organism with a selective advantage—such as faster replication, higher substrate affinity, or greater stress tolerance—will outcompete and displace the inferior competitor. This dynamic is often colloquially described as “survival of the fittest,” though in microbial systems, fitness is highly context-dependent and influenced by environmental parameters, spatial structure, and community complexity. Competitive dominance does not always correlate strictly with intrinsic growth rate. Slow-growing organisms may persist if they exhibit superior efficiency under oligotrophic conditions, enhanced stress resilience, or the ability to exploit alternative metabolic pathways. Spatial heterogeneity, biofilm formation, and microenvironmental gradients can further enable coexistence by partitioning niches and reducing direct competition. Competition plays a pivotal role in shaping microbial diversity, driving evolutionary adaptation, and influencing ecosystem processes such as nutrient cycling, pathogen colonization, and antimicrobial resistance dynamics. The outcome of competitive interactions determines which organisms dominate a community and control access to limiting resources. Through these mechanisms, competition acts as a central organizing force in microbial ecology, governing both community structure and functional stability across diverse environments.    

PREDATION

Predation is an ecological interaction in which one organism—the predator—locates, attacks, kills, and consumes another organism—the prey. It is a fundamental trophic process structuring biological communities across terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems. In classical predator–prey dynamics, the prey is typically smaller, less physically powerful, or otherwise more vulnerable than the predator. This asymmetry in morphology, physiology, or behavior confers a selective advantage to the predator, enabling successful capture and consumption. Predation exerts strong evolutionary pressures, driving adaptations such as camouflage, chemical defenses, warning coloration, speed, and complex behavioral strategies in prey species, as well as enhanced sensory systems, weaponry, and cooperative hunting strategies in predators. Although predation is often perceived solely as a detrimental interaction—culminating in the injury or death of the prey—it plays several indispensable roles in ecosystem function. By regulating prey population densities, predators prevent competitive exclusion and promote species diversity, a concept formalized in the keystone predator hypothesis. Predation also facilitates energy transfer across trophic levels, thereby sustaining food webs and influencing nutrient cycling. Furthermore, selective predation frequently removes weak, diseased, or genetically less-fit individuals from prey populations, contributing to overall population health and adaptive resilience. Beyond these classical ecological roles, predation can have more nuanced biological consequences, particularly in microbial systems. In aquatic environments, certain protozoa—most notably ciliates—engage in phagocytosis of bacteria as a primary feeding mechanism. Ciliates are unicellular eukaryotic microorganisms characterized by hair-like cilia used for locomotion and feeding.

Through phagocytosis, they internalize bacterial cells into membrane-bound vacuoles where digestion typically occurs. However, some bacterial species have evolved mechanisms to resist intracellular degradation, allowing them to survive—and in some cases replicate—within protozoan hosts. A well-documented example involves Legionella pneumophila, the etiological agent of Legionnaires’ disease. In natural and engineered aquatic systems, including cooling towers and air-conditioning units, L. pneumophila can be ingested by free-living ciliates and other protozoa. Instead of being digested, the bacterium can evade lysosomal destruction and persist intracellularly. This intracellular residence confers significant ecological advantages. Notably, the protozoan host can shield L. pneumophila from environmental stressors such as chlorination, a widely used disinfection strategy for controlling bacterial proliferation in water systems. By residing within protozoa, the bacterium gains protection against chemical biocides, desiccation, and other adverse conditions. Thus, while predation in this context appears antagonistic, it paradoxically enhances bacterial survival and persistence in anthropogenic water systems. The protozoan host effectively functions as a protective niche, increasing nutrient availability and facilitating transmission. This interaction exemplifies how predator–prey relationships in microbial ecology can deviate from traditional macroecological paradigms, sometimes resulting in mutualistic or commensal-like outcomes from the prey’s perspective. Predation is a multifaceted ecological process that shapes evolutionary trajectories, regulates populations, and maintains ecosystem stability. Although frequently lethal for prey organisms, it can also produce indirect or unexpected benefits, particularly in microbial systems where intracellular survival strategies transform a predatory interaction into an ecological advantage.      

References

Jee C and Shagufta (2007). Environmental Biotechnology. APH Publishing Corporation, Darya Ganj, New Delhi, India.

Maier R.M, Pepper I.L. and Gerba C.P (2000). Environmental Microbiology. Academic Press, San Diego.

Miguel A, Manuel F, Francisco J.P and Antonio B (2006). Environmental biocatalysis: from remediation with enzymes to novel green processes. TRENDS in Biotechnology, 24(6):1-7.

Mishra B.B, Nanda D.R and Dave S.R (2009). Environmental Microbiology. First edition. APH Publishing Corporation, Ansari Road, Darya Ganj, New Delhi, India.

Paul E.A (2007). Soil Microbiology, ecology and biochemistry. 3^rd edition. Oxford: Elsevier Publications, New York.

Pelczar M.J Jr, Chan E.C.S, Krieg N.R (1993). Microbiology: Concepts and Applications. McGraw-Hill, USA.

Pelczar M.J., Chan E.C.S. and Krieg N.R. (2003). Microbiology of Soil.  Microbiology, 5^th Edition. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi, India.

Pepper I.L and Gerba C.P (2005). Environmental Microbiology: A Laboratory Manual. Second Edition. Elsevier Academic Press, New York, USA. 

Roberto P. Anitori (2012). Extremophiles: Microbiology and Biotechnology. First edition. Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, England.

Salyers A.A and Whitt D.D (2001). Microbiology: diversity, disease, and the environment. Fitzgerald Science Press Inc. Maryland, USA.

Sawyer C.N, McCarty P.L and Parkin G.F (2003). Chemistry for Environmental Engineering and Science (5^th ed.). McGraw-Hill Publishers, New York, USA.

Ulrich A and Becker R (2006). Soil parent material is a key determinant of the bacterial community structure in arable soils. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 56(3):430–443.